InnovateME · Tender Intelligence

Governance in. Tender response out.

Extending RFP analysis into a governed global delivery workforce.
● Public interview demo · synthetic reference data
THE EXTENSION   Original RFP governance → evidence-backed response drafting → global agentic workforce → commercial options → human approval → SOC evidence hand-off. Samsung is a read-only display surface, never the security boundary.

Bid control room

A working shell for tender review, evidence coverage, and commercial judgement.
Source files in session
0
Browser-local intake
Requirements tracked
0
Extracted or entered
Evidence linked
0%
Coverage, not compliance
Bid recommendation
Not assessed
Awaiting source evidence

Current workstream

Prototype

New tender assessment

Add tender documents and create a traceable requirement ledger before assessing bid readiness.

Decision gates

Keep evidence, judgement, and unknowns distinct.

1
Scope understood

Source documents and response schedule identified.

2
Evidence mapped

Each material requirement linked to a proof item or gap.

3
Commercial case reviewed

Costs, assumptions, risks and margin are explicit.

4
Human decision recorded

Bid / no-bid requires accountable approval.

Latest activity

0 events
No events yet. Add a source document or record a requirement to begin.

Tender intake

Register source material and extract plain-text requirements for review.
Client-side only

Source material

Supported in this first increment: .txt, .md and .csv for local text extraction. Other file types are registered but not parsed.

⇧
Drop tender files here or choose files
No upload to a remote service
No source files registered.

Manual requirement capture

Use this for requirements identified during human review.

Text extraction review

Line-based candidates are suggestions only; confirm the exact clause and reference before using them in a bid response.

Text candidates appear here after a supported file is selected.

Evidence ledger

Trace every requirement to evidence, a gap, or a named follow-up.

Requirements and evidence status

0 records
IDRequirementSourceCriticalityEvidence statusEvidence / gap noteAction
No requirements recorded.

Update evidence status

Status means evidence state, not an automatic legal/compliance conclusion.

Commercial model

A transparent starting point for pricing assumptions, cost coverage and margin sensitivity.
Illustrative until populated
Delivery cost
$0
Entered assumptions
Bid price
$0
Excludes tax unless entered
Gross margin
—
Bid price less delivery cost
Currency
AUD
No FX conversion in this increment

Pricing assumptions

Decision hygiene

!
Don't invent market rates

Attach the source, date, geography, currency and role level for each rate.

FX
FX is not live

Currency selector changes the unit label only. No conversion is performed.

%
Margin is not markup

Gross margin = (price − cost) ÷ price. Contingency is shown separately until included in cost.

✓
Human approval required

No bid/no-bid or pricing approval is automated by this prototype.

RFT response builder

Draft from the visible requirement ledger without inventing evidence or certifications.
Draft only · human approval required

Response controls

Editable response

Every claim and citation requires human verification.

No draft generated. Nothing is submitted automatically.

Agentic workforce planner

Compare role patterns by region, technology, clearance eligibility and illustrative cost.
Synthetic profiles · not live availability
Illustrative profiles and rates only. They do not prove a person holds a clearance, is available, or is eligible to access a buyer’s data. Validate clearance, jurisdiction, residency, skills and rates independently.

Workforce filters

Assignment rules

1
Capability before allocation

Match skills and technology, then verify evidence.

2
Clearance is a hard gate

Never infer it from nationality, location or job title.

3
Respect jurisdiction and residency

Validate buyer rules, subcontractors and data access.

4
Human authority stays explicit

No autonomous bid, price or submission approval.

Role patterns

12 patterns

Commercial comparison

Illustrative cost model · not a quote

Samsung / large-screen briefing

A read-only result view inspired by “the TV plays; the companion explains”.
Preview only · not connected to TV

Display controls

A real integration needs an authenticated read-only endpoint and an allowlisted data projection. This preview is not that endpoint.

Display preview

T4H · SYNTHETIC BRIEFING

HOLD

Mandatory proof gap. Two certification dates expired in the fixture. Human review required.

Security boundary

The Samsung screen is a presentation endpoint only. Tender logic, identity, authorisation, evidence retention and operational receipts remain in their respective services. The screen cannot grant access, invoke tools or attest that work ran.

Agent operations

Separate observed execution evidence from an agent's own status claims.
No runtime connector
Observed external runs
0
No external telemetry connected
Tool receipts verified
0
No invocation receipts loaded
Failures / retries
—
Unknown until telemetry connected
Agent autonomy
Not enabled
No authorised actions configured

Required event envelope

Independent telemetry should record these fields from the execution boundary, not trust an agent-written summary.

Event ID / timestampUnique receipt and UTC time
Principal / scopeWho acted and under what grant
Tool / resourceExact capability and target
Invocation / outcomeRequest hash, status, error or retry
Evidence / readbackIndependent confirmation of side effect

Boundary status

1
Public interface

This page contains no credentials or privileged control actions.

2
Private MCP layer

Not connected. Keep authenticated and least-privilege.

3
Samsung TV

Optional display surface only; no TV control integration is configured.

TECH 4 HUMANITY · TENDER INTELLIGENCE WORKBENCHPrototype · Browser-local state · No production compliance claims